in 52 Weeks
Sarah Smith, 18?? – 1846
So much about genealogy research is a challenge: finding vital records, reading old handwriting, obtaining research materials, etc. But, perhaps, the most common challenge is the ‘brick wall’. The dreaded brick wall, in genealogy, is the ancestor who defies being researched. For me, my brick walls have been mainly the women who lived prior to 1850 when family members were not included in the federal census’ and births were not recorded.
The most troubling of these is my third great grandmother on my matrilineal line. This is the ancestral line following only women/mothers. This line is the source of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) which is passed from a mother to her children, only women pass this DNA which means if you match mtDNA with someone you definitely share an ancestor on your matrilineal line. This mtDNA can remain the same over hundreds of generations with only minor mutations. I feel strongly I should know the women who have passed down my mtDNA, but I need to break this particular brick wall first.
Gilbert - Mitchell 1850
Gilbert - Moore 1847
Gilbert - Smith 1843
For several years, I thought I knew the name of my matrilineal third great grandmother, Julia Anne Mitchell, 1830-1908. This belief was primarily based on family oral history. After all, my great grandmother, Ella Rumple King, who died in 1962, knew Julia Anne and referred to her as Grandmother Gilbert. Then, a few years ago I was contacted by a ‘cousin’ who shares this ancestral family with me and he had obtained marriage records of both Julia Anne Mitchell and a Sarah Anne Moore to our third great grandfather Samuel Gilbert.
The record for Julia is clearly dated October 1850  and the one for Sarah is clearly dated July 1847 . So, Julia was out and Sarah was in… My second great grandmother, Hannah Gilbert, 1844-1874, named her eldest daughter Sarah and gave her second daughter the middle name Anne. So, Sarah Anne Moore, 1824-1849, was a good fit. Except… Hannah Gilbert is documented as being born in 1844 . More research was required.
The Gilbert’s lived in Cranberry Township, Crawford County, Ohio during the mid-19th century . The cousin who found the marriage records had traveled there and done the research, but he had found no records predating the 1847 marriage record. Samuel Gilbert, my third great grandfather is also a brick wall. I do not know who his parents were, or exactly where he was born. Census records, and his death record , indicate he was born in Pennsylvania in 1812, but that’s all they reveal. The surname Gilbert has proven to be a challenge. However, I did find a land record online for the purchase of the land in Cranberry Township dated in 1835 and indicating Samuel lived in Stark County . As a side note, Samuel bought this land as ‘tenants in common’ with a man named Philip Immel. Naturally I thought Stark County, and possibly Philip Immel, could be a clue to an earlier, pre-1844, marriage for Samuel. But I was wrong.
I could not find Samuel in the 1840 census for Stark or Crawford Counties and I could not find a marriage record for him in Stark County either. I did find Philip Immel in Cranberry Twp in the 1840 census with a wife and children . I researched Philip and found he had a sister, but she did not marry Samuel Gilbert. I did discover that Philip and his wife named a son born in 1849 Samuel and a daughter born in 1854 Julia Anne . Obviously the Immel’s and Gilbert’s were good friends. I noted that the Immel’s had daughters born in 1842 and 1845, were they a clue to who my third great grandmother was? So I searched for women named Lovina and Amanda in Stark and Crawford Counties, but to no avail. I also looked at Mrs. Immel’s sisters, surname Noyer, but none of them married a Gilbert. I am rather envious that the Immel family is better documented than my Gilbert family.
For a long time I thought I may never know who my matrilineal third great grandmother was, but then in 2016 Ohio marriage records were digitized and added to Ancestry.com. A simple search for Samuel Gilbert between 1840 and 1844 revealed a record for Samuel and Sarah Smith in Richland County in March 1843 . The Gilbert farm in Crawford County is just west of the Richland County line, although 21 miles from the county seat, could this be my Samuel Gilbert? I realized all three marriage records have Samuel’s signature and a quick comparison told me this was my Samuel Gilbert and in all likelihood my third great grandmother was this Sarah Smith!
Why did Samuel and Sarah marry in Richland County and not Crawford? The county seat of Crawford is just 12 miles from the Gilbert farm. Perhaps Sarah Smith lived in Richland County. I knew the surname Smith would be a challenge to research, and a quick search of the 1840 census for Richland County revealed 75 heads of households named Smith! That’s an overwhelming number of households to research without more to go on. There were far fewer Smith’s in Stark and Crawford Counties in 1840 and when narrowed down to Cranberry Township, I did find a Smith on the same page with Philip Immel, a good friend of Samuel Gilbert. However, Mr. Smith did not have daughters of the right age to be Sarah . But I’ll keep his record, perhaps he is a brother or uncle. There was another Smith in the township and he did have a daughter in the right age range to be Sarah, he is a definite lead . I found a Sarah Smith in Stark County, apparently, a widow, 50 to 59 years of age, and she had three women in the household who were in the age range to be my Sarah Smith .
Additionally, there was a man named George Gilbert, 50 to 59, on the previous census page with a man in his household the right age range to be my Samuel Gilbert. Could these census records be leads to revealing more about Samuel and Sarah? I need more clues and so far none have presented themselves.
I feel confident I have found my matrilineal third great grandmother, but the challenge remains to discover her familial details and who was her mother?, my matrilineal fourth great grandmother. Ah, a new challenge!
- Samuel Gilbert and Julia Ann Mitchell, 10 Oct 1850, Ohio, County Marriage Records, 1774-1993 [database on-line], Crawford County, Year Range: 1847 – 1854. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com, 2016. Vol4, p263, Film# 000388676; https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/61378/TH-1-17957-100415-71/2810369
- Samuel Gilbert and Sarah Ann Moore, 22 Jul 1847, Ohio, County Marriage Records, 1774-1993 [database on-line], Crawford County, Year Range: 1847 – 1854. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com, 2016. Vol3, p31, Film# 000388676; https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/61378/TH-1-17957-98471-24/2816669
- Entry for Hannah Gilbert, U.S, Federal Census: Year: 1850; Census Place: Todd, Crawford, Ohio; Roll: M432_671; Page: 48B; https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/8054/4191060-00393/13424952
- Entry for Sam’l Gilbert, U.S, Federal Census: Year: 1850; Census Place: Todd, Crawford, Ohio; Roll: M432_671; Page: 48B; https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/8054/4191060-00393/13424952
- Certificate of Death, entry for Samuel Gilbert, 27 Oct 1895, Ohio, County Death Records, 1840-2001, database with images, FamilySearch, Henry County Death records, 1882-1921, vol 3-5; image 135 of 331; https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F6XQ-M29
- Entry for Samuel Gilbert, 15 Dec 1835, U.S. General Land Office Records, 1796-1907, doc# 3062, Orig. URL: http://glorecords.blm.gov/details/patent/default.aspx?accession=OH0580__.091&docClass=STA&sid=uvtpmymt.ydf
- Entry for Philip Immel, U.S, Federal Census: Year: 1840; Census Place: Cranbury, Crawford, Ohio; Roll: 388; Page: 34; Family History Library Film: 0020163; https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/8057/4410724_00073/2615230
- Entry for Philip Immel, U.S, Federal Census: Year: 1850; Census Place: Cranberry, Crawford, Ohio; Roll: M432_671; Page: 452B; https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/8054/4191060-00273/13420299
- Samuel Gilbert and Sarah Smith, 3 Mar 1843, Ohio, County Marriage Records, 1774-1993 [database on-line], Richland County, Year Range: 1833 – 1854. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com, 2016. Vol3, p506, Film# 000388736; https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/61378/TH-1-17790-58778-39/2497375
- Entry for Same Smith, U.S, Federal Census: Year: 1840; Census Place: Cranbury, Crawford, Ohio; Roll: 388; Page: 34; Family History Library Film: 0020163; https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/8057/4410724_00073/2615234
- Entry for James Smith, U.S, Federal Census: Year: 1840; Census Place: Cranbury, Crawford, Ohio; Roll: 388; Page: 35; Family History Library Film: 0020163; https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/8057/4410724_00075/2615262
- Entries for George Gilbert and Sarah Smith, U.S, Federal Census: Year: 1840; Census Place: Sugar Creek, Stark, Ohio; Roll: 427; Pages: 199 and 200; Family History Library Film: 0020177; https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/8057/4410636_00404/3340865
Born Takeo Furukawa on 15 March 1883 in Tottori-Ken, Tokyo, Japan, little is documented of his early childhood. Family oral history stories say that the young Takeo experienced hunger, poverty and the loss of his family. Additionally, the stories tell of friendship, spiritual learning and scholarship.
My great grandfather, David Louis Osborne, lived at over 20 addresses around Indianapolis between 1876 and 1942. I thought it would be interesting to see all the old buildings and homes where he lived in my hometown of Indianapolis.
My great grandfather, David Louis Osborne (1848-1942), was a widower with two young sons in 1886 when he married Jennie Warbington (1857-1918) in Minneapolis on the 27th of May. I decided it was time to put sources to the story.
While working on a family photo project I decided it would be fun to compare side-by-side my father and his parents, at similar ages, to try and discover a family resemblance.
Jesse King was born in Ohio (probably in the vicinity of Chillicothe) in 1805, he was a son of Philip King and Mary Leah Wright, both of Pennsylvania. Philip King was a farmer, he married Leah Wright in 1801 in Somerset, PA, they had six children, of whom Jesse was the third.
A handwritten letter from Sarah Tucker Lafary to the then president of the United States, Grover Cleveland. It was her last appeal for a War of 1812 pension, sadly the pension was denied. The letter gives a glimpse of a woman who had no formal education, a poor farmers wife, then widow, mother of nine, she probably just wanted some independence through an income of her own.
52 Ancestors, in 52 Weeks – Week 2: Challenge
So much about genealogy research is a challenge, perhaps the most common challenge is the ‘brick wall,’ meet Sarah Smith. 18?? – 1846
52 Ancestors, in 52 Weeks – Week 3: Unusual Name
The surnames in my tree are typical of common western European names. However, the name that is unusual among these names is MY surname: LaFara.
52 Ancestors, in 52 Weeks – Week 6: Surprise!
Just when you think you know everything about an ancestor, surprise! I thought I knew most everything about my paternal great grandfather David L. Osborne, 1848-1942.
52 Ancestors, in 52 Weeks – Week 8: Family Photo
For all of us who are procrastinating about labeling photos I have one thing to say, “Be considerate of the genealogist of the future!” My maternal grandmother was very good about labeling old family photos, and there is one in particular I found very informative.
52 Ancestors, in 52 Weeks – Week 10: Bachelor Uncle
My uncles are the marrying kind, sometimes more than once!
I had to go back four generations for a bachelor uncle, my great-great-great uncle Conrad Rumple, 1833-1911.
Conrad was an older brother to my great-great grandfather on my matrilineal line, William Rumple, 1839-1912.
52 Ancestors, in 52 Weeks – Week 11: Large Family
My great-great grandparents, George Lafary and Catherine Landon, had a relatively small family, three of their six children survived to adulthood. However, they both came from large families of nine siblings and nearly all survived to marry and have children.
52 Ancestors, in 52 Weeks – Week 13: In The Paper
It’s fun to find articles in the paper mentioning one of my relatives. Mostly they are birth, marriage, divorce and death events. But, it’s the oddball articles in the papers I like the most.
52 Ancestors, in 52 Weeks – Week 14: Brick Wall
We all have a brick wall, that one ancestor who defies all research. I decided I would work at my brick walls by generation, I broke through the last of my 3rd great grandparent brick walls, now I am working on 4th great grandparents.
52 Ancestors, in 52 Weeks – Week 16: Out of Place
I realized I did not have a date of death for my great, great grandmother, Catherine Landon Lafary. A fresh search uncovered the date and much more. Out of place, but once discovered, everything fell into place.
I have many favorite photos among my collection of family artifacts. Currently, my favorite photo is of two little children from 1916 who were a complete mystery to me until last spring.